This submission links to the actual paper. The other submission is the NY Times' summary of it.
tomhow 285 days ago [-]
We still consider it a dupe if it's about the same underlying topic, which it certainly is in this case.
Sometimes we'll update the URL to the canonical source (i.e., the study paper) if the submitted article is just a summary that adds no substance (aka blog spam). But if it's a report from a reputable publication that adds substance, we'll leave that as the URL and link to the study paper from the top text, which I've done now.
285 days ago [-]
285 days ago [-]
flkenosad 285 days ago [-]
Aura farming 101
Rendered at 23:13:11 GMT+0000 (UTC) with Wasmer Edge.
Sometimes we'll update the URL to the canonical source (i.e., the study paper) if the submitted article is just a summary that adds no substance (aka blog spam). But if it's a report from a reputable publication that adds substance, we'll leave that as the URL and link to the study paper from the top text, which I've done now.