For the past few years I've made a conscious effort to not use swear words like "fucking" and "shit" casually. I feel like if they're overused they lose their power, to yourself and to others around you. Everyone of us knows that guy or girl that never normally swears, so then when they do you know it's serious.
Do habitual swearers need to resort to racial slurs for pain relief?
BiteCode_dev 3 days ago [-]
My alternative is to use old-fashioned swear words like Fudge, Poppycock, Scullion or Harlot.
It satisfies my urge, and it sounds funny.
PyWoody 3 days ago [-]
I have no idea when or why this happened but, in my everyday usage, I've flipped the intention of vulgar swear words with the old-fashioned swear words.
Are you fucking kidding me == lol
Are you fricking kidding me == Rage
somedude895 3 days ago [-]
Oh frick yes. It also makes you sound like a goodie two shoes schoolboy from a 1950s movie. Has delivered quite a few laughs and joy to people at work.
MattPalmer1086 4 days ago [-]
At school my German teacher loved to teach us the longest swear word in German (or so he claimed). He would illustrate it by pretending he hit his thumb with a hammer, and then he would let out this wonderful long stream of invective, but which is one word in German. He would then translate it all for us.
No idea if it helps with hitting your thumb with a hammer, but memorable teaching!
MisterTea 4 days ago [-]
> longest swear word in German
Inquiring minds want to know...
MattPalmer1086 4 days ago [-]
I wish I could remember. Words in German can be long as they are composed of other words. It was along the lines of thunder and lightning and terrible storms blight you! But I think there was a bit more to it than that.
EDIT; and the teacher may have made the entire thing up of course! Loved his lessons.
vincent-manis 4 days ago [-]
Untergrundbahnhofzeitschriftsplatz: Subway station newspaper stand
chrisweekly 3 days ago [-]
The root primitives are so easy to discern and interpret:
under,ground, train,yard
time,writing
place
nothrabannosir 3 days ago [-]
(Bahn is more like track, not train)
scns 3 days ago [-]
Sorry to be a pedant but bahnhof means train station
Izkata 3 days ago [-]
..and then "autobahn" would be..?
detaro 3 days ago [-]
almost as if word meanings were dependent on context ("railway" would probably have been a more accurate than "train", but going "actually it means track" is just not helpful in this context)
Izkata 3 days ago [-]
I think you missed the comment that was doing a complete breakdown of the components. If anything by your argument it's more relevant because it shows the breakdown can sometimes be misleading.
detaro 2 days ago [-]
no, I didn't.
cubefox 4 days ago [-]
By the way, English also has compound nouns, only they are sometimes written with spaces and sometimes without. Sometimes even with dashes. E.g. compare "coalmine" and "file name". Compound nouns can get arbitrarily long too, e.g. "file name length limit history blog post introduction".
sib 4 days ago [-]
While English has compound nouns, they are different in that they are not (generally) single words.
"Association for Subordinate Officials of the Main Maintenance Building of the Danube Steamboat Shipping Company"
knome 3 days ago [-]
Squashing "danube steamboat shipping company electric services main maintenance building subordinate officials association" into a single word vs leaving it spaced out is kind of irrelevant. It's like getting excited over PascalCase vs snake_case.
swinglock 3 days ago [-]
Instead try for example "washing machine motor" and you'll find it's a feature fixing issues with clarity, not a style preference.
philwelch 4 days ago [-]
It just takes longer to standardize them but English absolutely has compound single words. Examples include “folklore”, “pancake”, “manslaughter”, “oatmeal”, “pocketknife”, and “gunman”.
TulliusCicero 3 days ago [-]
Right, they're just typically limited to two subwords.
philwelch 3 days ago [-]
Albeit rare, triple compound words are nonetheless commonly used and recognized in English. Many of them sound formal and archaic but they are nevertheless still in common usage nowadays, not merely a relic of the days of highwaymen and crossbowmen. The archaic examples heretofore used notwithstanding, it would be false to claim that there are no triple compound words whatsoever.
(Inasmuch as I've made my point, I will spare you any further woebegone prose.)
joenada 3 days ago [-]
This guy writes.
sib 3 days ago [-]
And you can't typically just make them up as you go along and have them accepted as "words."
cubefox 3 days ago [-]
That translation is inaccurate because the original is a compound noun, while your translation isn't. The translation posted by knome is more accurate.
> While English has compound nouns, they are different in that they are not (generally) single words.
That's if you define "word" as anything that is separated by spaces in writing. But you could instead count all compound nouns as words. That would have the advantage of not being dependent on arbitrary rules in the writing system.
SoftTalker 4 days ago [-]
And they work as swears too.
Goddamnmotherfuckingsonofabitch
etc.
cubefox 4 days ago [-]
Though I believe that's technically not a compound noun. (Fun fact: "compound noun" is a compound noun.)
4 days ago [-]
schandmaul 3 days ago [-]
Himmi Herrgott Sackl Zement Zefix Halleluja Mi Leckst Am Oarsch Scheiss Glump Faregets
Edit: It‘s irrelevant if you write it as one word, you certainly say it as one.
thaumasiotes 3 days ago [-]
> It‘s irrelevant if you write it as one word, you certainly say it as one.
True, but you say everything as one word. You produce "It's irrelevant if you write it as one word" as one word. It has substitutable parts, which is also true of German compound words.
People are shockingly gullible about the fact that compound nouns in German are written without spaces while the grammatically identical compound nouns that are so common in English are written with them, as if spaces occurred in speech.
cubefox 3 days ago [-]
> People are shockingly gullible about the fact that compound nouns in German are written without spaces while the grammatically identical compound nouns that are so common in English are written with them, as if spaces occurred in speech.
Yeah. And distinctions that don't even occur in speech are arguably not suited to define the general concept of "word". You wouldn't know from speaking that "coalmine" has no space but "file name" has. I would count them both as single words, because they are single compound nouns.
The "space theory of words" would mean that languages without a writing system don't have "words", or that people who can't read also can't distinguish "words", which is clearly nonsense.
falcor84 3 days ago [-]
Is "file name" really two words? I can't remember a time I ever saw `file_name`, it's always just `filename`.
cubefox 3 days ago [-]
Well, I would humbly propose that "file name" is one word, even if it is written with a space, and despite consisting of two words.
CamouflagedKiwi 3 days ago [-]
No you don't. There are stress patterns in words that wouldn't exist if a sentence was all one word - in English words have at most one primary stressed syllable, and a sentence may have multiple such syllables.
thaumasiotes 3 days ago [-]
Those stress patterns already do exist in sentences. What do you think the difference is between a word that is pronounced without its citation form primary stress ("at most one primary stressed syllable") and a sentence that is pronounced with several more or less equally stressed syllables?
The difference between primary and secondary word stress disappears when the word is put into a sentence.
There are stress patterns in sentences that don't exist in lexical words, but they do exist in compound phrases, and there is no symmetrical situation of stress patterns in words that don't happen in sentences.
xarope 3 days ago [-]
As a kid, I vaguely remember appropriating some that I thought were from Tin Tin/Captain Haddock, but when I look in the list[1], I don't recognize my favorites :-(.
[edit] holy mackerel, you odd-toed ungulate, I found some!
techdmn 4 days ago [-]
Many years ago, my daughter (maybe six at the time), lost something semi-important to her, I don't recall what. I think it might have been her username / pictorial password card for her school network account. Anyway, we were looking for it, and she said "Dad, dad, I don't know where it is, I feel like I'm going to say a bad word".
I, having just read an article like this, said "That's ok, sometimes saying a bad word can help you process your emotions and feel less stressed. Do you want to go down to the basement where nobody can hear you, and say the bad word?"
"Yes". She goes down the stairs, I close the door, and she yells at the top of her lungs: "I can't fucking find it!". I managed not to laugh, she comes back up, "Do you feel better?" "Yes." Great moments in parenting. :-) (We did eventually find whatever it was.)
jacobgkau 4 days ago [-]
To think, you could've taken that opportunity to point out to her that saying the bad word didn't actually help her find it. Or you could've told her immediately that you heard her through the door because she yelled. Instead, you raised a casual swearer who's unaware of her surroundings. I hope nobody ever has to live in an apartment next to her.
qualeed 4 days ago [-]
It's comments like this that really make participating on this forum not fun.
It's a cute story. Fuck is just a word. They aren't going to grow up to be a bad person because they said it as a kid, and it's wild to say stuff like this to someone when you have literally no other context about their life or upbringing.
Your weird negativity to a stranger and implying they aren't doing a good job parenting based on them sharing a couple sentence long story is, in my opinion, a worse character trait than saying fuck every now and again. You have 0 idea what kind of kid they are raising.
Oh the horror of a "casual swearer"!
gsinclair 3 days ago [-]
Praise be to this comment!
galaxyLogic 3 days ago [-]
There are T-shirts that say
"Fuck You You Fucking Fuck!".
It also can be almost any part of a a sentence. “Fuck the fucking fucks.” Versatile!
johnisgood 3 days ago [-]
I have a pretty amazing t-shirt that says "Fuck you" all over. I believe it is available in a hoodie version, too. I do not mind wearing it to the doctor's office either. Even though they may not speak English, everyone knows what "Fuck you" means.
Cthulhu_ 3 days ago [-]
No, but it did teach her you can't just blurt out words like that, teaching self-control. In theory anyway. And she was aware of it - the fact she removed herself etc taught her not to be a casual swearer.
The trick isn't to hide them from bad words - no matter how much censorship you apply to TV, film, youtube, whatever they will learn them. But it's to teach them when to (not) use them. If done right, they'll know they shouldn't just casually use it.
Anyway, love seeing people without kids chime in.
sunrunner 4 days ago [-]
> saying the bad word didn't actually help her find it
Any proof of this?
close04 3 days ago [-]
> you could've taken that opportunity to point out
Let the kids make some "mistakes", and let them think they got away with it. It gives them the some agency, it encourages them to explore and push boundaries, as long as you're there to make sure they don't cross a line they can't come back from. Light swearing is not where you need to draw that line.
lxe 3 days ago [-]
Sir, this isn't Instagram
sunrunner 3 days ago [-]
(Knowingly going against all HN comment guidelines...)
And with a few more paragraphs it would also be perfectly formatted for LinkedIn.
3 days ago [-]
supermatt 3 days ago [-]
It’s bold of you to critique someone else’s parenting when it’s clearly your own parents who raised the sanctimonious little cunt (not a curse, just an observation) in this conversation.
johnisgood 3 days ago [-]
I mean, if there is a pattern of her going to the basement to yell whenever, then yeah, it would indeed be bad parenting, and I would not want to live next to her either when she becomes an adult. :D As long as it was a one time thing, sure, but if she was conditioned to believe it was "the right way to swear", then nah.
That said, I could not give a fuck about who swears and who does not swear, but I do give a damn about volume.
(Says the guy who is going to get married to a Latina soon.)
3 days ago [-]
3 days ago [-]
techbrovanguard 3 days ago [-]
i will never understand people that are puritains about swearing
bombcar 3 days ago [-]
There’s a special form of embarrassment when your five year old suddenly announces to the entire preschool that they “can’t fucking find the truck”.
Some don’t handle it well.
timewizard 4 days ago [-]
Anecdotally I find swearing makes it worse. Now I just saw "ow!" or "that hurt!" Which honestly feels like it synchronizes my brain past the insult and I can move on much faster past it.
ethan_smith 4 days ago [-]
This matches research on pain catastrophizing vs. neutralizing - your approach of acknowledging pain directly without emotional amplification may be activating different neural pathways than those enhanced by taboo-word usage.
Cthulhu_ 3 days ago [-]
Yeah, I never get the compulsion to swear when doing something stupid to myself lol. People have impulse control, but it may be stronger in some than others.
MisterTea 4 days ago [-]
Similar: I say something amusing/funny, e.g. I hit my head on a piece of metal and yelled "ah ya mother was a tin can you metal bastard" which breaks your thought from the pain. Screaming fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu... only keeps you focused.
bombcar 3 days ago [-]
This is the Captain Haddock method. It’s quite effective as you get distracted thinking up new terms.
chrisweekly 3 days ago [-]
hahaha, I'm going to try this
Supermancho 3 days ago [-]
In primates there are commonly 3 noises as a reaction to danger.
Initially the work from the 70s-80s on vervet monkeys https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7433999/
which was then found to be generalized for a host of other primates
~1 for danger in the air
~1 for danger on the ground
misc for unspecified danger
I would bet that modern swearing maps to these calls in a less specific way. Equivalents of "this shite" "that arsehole" and "damnnit" may have an evolutionary origin.
ArtRichards 3 days ago [-]
I was looking for this comment!
That being a possible reason why certain words alleviate, they actually operate at a different level in our conciousness.
kulahan 3 days ago [-]
I use a mix of both, but when I’m in really serious pain, I also find it’s more effective when I’m just like “Wew. WOW. Yeah that’s pretty good there. Phew. Wow. WOOOW.”
I dunno why, but wow seems to work well for me.
dtgriscom 3 days ago [-]
I spent two years of high school learning Russian. I can't remember much of it, except the section of the alphabet that sounds like swearing: р, с, т, у, ф, х (pronounced, approximately, and with feeling: "er ess teh, oo eff HAH").
neoden 3 days ago [-]
Oh, Russian is exceptionally well built for swearing. It provides possibilities barely imaginable from the perspective of languages such as English because of how mutable and composable word structure is. With roughly the same base set of 3-4 swear words the actual number of different forms that could be used goes to thousands and is hard to count, each word having its own shade of meaning and sometimes many more than one.
oxonia 3 days ago [-]
Tell us more.
neoden 3 days ago [-]
For example, one word which is a form derived from one of the basic swear words can be used to describe/express: 1) disastrous circumstances, 2) extreme surprise, 3) an end-game event making very negative prospects for the future.
An adjective from the same stem would make another word with the meaning on the other side of the spectrum, which is basically "really cool, highly approved". An adjective similar but constructed in a little different way would mean "weird, crazy".
From the same stem you can make three most common verbs, one with meanings "beat up", "steal", another quite similar with meaning "lie" and a third one meaning "talk". Light modifications of the latter form allow some fine-tuning of the meaning, giving words describing more complex behaviour: 1) suddenly say something unexpected, that will attract the attention of others, causing amazement and approval, 2) unintentionally give up a secret, blurt out too much, 3) get yourself in trouble by talking too much, or even 4) fall down from a certain height or bump into an object receiving a light injury.
and so on, and so forth..
Finnucane 4 days ago [-]
You'll sing a different tune when you're getting fouched in the twizpipe.
Cthulhu_ 3 days ago [-]
Getting frelled in the eema, if you will.
carpo 3 days ago [-]
When my kids were younger I tried to to replace my swearing by saying "sugarplum fairies". It was fairly successful in becoming a natural replacement. However, the other day I kicked my toe really badly and instinctively yelled "sugarplum FUCKING fairies" and my kids (now early teen) found it extremely funny.
dspillett 3 days ago [-]
> This is the first study to find that new, made-up “swear” words do not have similar pain alleviation effects to regular swearing.
I think this is in part due to the nature of the words, they “appeal” (perhaps come from) a much older part of our minds than the idea that they might be offensive. The most effective swears are generally about procreation and other bodily functions - the things that we cared about before we even had that much of our current language.
Another side effect of this seems to be visible in those with dementia and other age or illness related degradations: some can barely say a few words normally but can still string a perfectly coherent set of expletives together when they need or want.
I read once that there is a common structure to swear words. If you think about it, fuck, cunt, shit, crap - they all have kiiind of a similar vocal feeling.
I wonder if different fake swear words may have had a different outcome.
Cthulhu_ 3 days ago [-]
The Farscape ones are great. Frell and dren have similar vibes.
slowmovintarget 4 days ago [-]
"Glenfarclas!" I frequently exclaim to the bewilderment of my child.
IAmBroom 4 days ago [-]
There's a lovely story of a dad who's wife said, "Lil Johhny said a bad word today. Go talk to him." Or something to that effect.
"Johnny, Momma tells me you said X. That's pretty bad, but at least you didn't say the worst word..."
"What's that?" "Can't tell you!" <negotiations> "OK, but you have to PROMISE you'll never say it in front of Momma. It's <whispers> booglashek."
Next day, all his friends were over, calling each other booglasheks.
smitelli 4 days ago [-]
Percy Livermore: We must rid our speech of slang. Now, besides "OK", I want you all to promise me that there are two words that you will never use. One of these is "swell" and the other one is "lousy".
Lucy Ricardo: OK, what are they?
Percy Livermore: [with emphasis] One of them is "swell" and the other one is "lousy".
Fred Mertz: Well, give us the lousy one first.
EvanAnderson 4 days ago [-]
I spelled around my daughter. This worked until, between 3 and 4 y/o, she asked a preschool teacher what "F-U-C-K" spelled. The teacher asked where she'd heard it and she said her father spelled it a lot.
lxe 3 days ago [-]
This was the first paper I read almost to completion. What a fascinating read. It's cool to see the hypotheses be refuted through experimentation. TL;DR: twizpipe and fouch don't help with pain, while "fuck" does.
codeulike 4 days ago [-]
Twizpipe
bombcar 3 days ago [-]
I’m going to keep this as a replacement for “piehole” the next time I need it with a twizzler eater.
Throaway629 3 days ago [-]
SHAZBOT!!!!
cptcobalt 3 days ago [-]
classic tribes!
slig 4 days ago [-]
Anecdotally, I find swearing in German and Italian satisfying and people around usually don't understand, so no issues there.
pif 4 days ago [-]
I had been working at CERN for a bit less than a year, when my Russo-Israelian coworker, who had never visited Italy, erupted in a perfect "Porca puttana!" that made me question my manners in the office.
HK-NC 3 days ago [-]
Ibyend to use Italian when mildly annoyed and German when utterly pissed off. How about you?
slig 3 days ago [-]
Me too! It just works ™.
fuzzy_biscuit 4 days ago [-]
I swear in Italian and Russian. Great minds think alike!
It satisfies my urge, and it sounds funny.
Are you fucking kidding me == lol
Are you fricking kidding me == Rage
No idea if it helps with hitting your thumb with a hammer, but memorable teaching!
Inquiring minds want to know...
EDIT; and the teacher may have made the entire thing up of course! Loved his lessons.
For example, the lovely and memorable
Donaudampfschiffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft
would be translated into something like
"Association for Subordinate Officials of the Main Maintenance Building of the Danube Steamboat Shipping Company"
(Inasmuch as I've made my point, I will spare you any further woebegone prose.)
> While English has compound nouns, they are different in that they are not (generally) single words.
That's if you define "word" as anything that is separated by spaces in writing. But you could instead count all compound nouns as words. That would have the advantage of not being dependent on arbitrary rules in the writing system.
Goddamnmotherfuckingsonofabitch
etc.
Edit: It‘s irrelevant if you write it as one word, you certainly say it as one.
True, but you say everything as one word. You produce "It's irrelevant if you write it as one word" as one word. It has substitutable parts, which is also true of German compound words.
People are shockingly gullible about the fact that compound nouns in German are written without spaces while the grammatically identical compound nouns that are so common in English are written with them, as if spaces occurred in speech.
Yeah. And distinctions that don't even occur in speech are arguably not suited to define the general concept of "word". You wouldn't know from speaking that "coalmine" has no space but "file name" has. I would count them both as single words, because they are single compound nouns.
The "space theory of words" would mean that languages without a writing system don't have "words", or that people who can't read also can't distinguish "words", which is clearly nonsense.
The difference between primary and secondary word stress disappears when the word is put into a sentence.
There are stress patterns in sentences that don't exist in lexical words, but they do exist in compound phrases, and there is no symmetrical situation of stress patterns in words that don't happen in sentences.
[1] https://tintin.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_Captain_Haddock%27s_C...
[edit] holy mackerel, you odd-toed ungulate, I found some!
I, having just read an article like this, said "That's ok, sometimes saying a bad word can help you process your emotions and feel less stressed. Do you want to go down to the basement where nobody can hear you, and say the bad word?"
"Yes". She goes down the stairs, I close the door, and she yells at the top of her lungs: "I can't fucking find it!". I managed not to laugh, she comes back up, "Do you feel better?" "Yes." Great moments in parenting. :-) (We did eventually find whatever it was.)
It's a cute story. Fuck is just a word. They aren't going to grow up to be a bad person because they said it as a kid, and it's wild to say stuff like this to someone when you have literally no other context about their life or upbringing.
Your weird negativity to a stranger and implying they aren't doing a good job parenting based on them sharing a couple sentence long story is, in my opinion, a worse character trait than saying fuck every now and again. You have 0 idea what kind of kid they are raising.
Oh the horror of a "casual swearer"!
See: https://www.etsy.com/market/fuck_you_you_fucking
The trick isn't to hide them from bad words - no matter how much censorship you apply to TV, film, youtube, whatever they will learn them. But it's to teach them when to (not) use them. If done right, they'll know they shouldn't just casually use it.
Anyway, love seeing people without kids chime in.
Any proof of this?
Let the kids make some "mistakes", and let them think they got away with it. It gives them the some agency, it encourages them to explore and push boundaries, as long as you're there to make sure they don't cross a line they can't come back from. Light swearing is not where you need to draw that line.
And with a few more paragraphs it would also be perfectly formatted for LinkedIn.
That said, I could not give a fuck about who swears and who does not swear, but I do give a damn about volume.
(Says the guy who is going to get married to a Latina soon.)
Some don’t handle it well.
Initially the work from the 70s-80s on vervet monkeys https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7433999/ which was then found to be generalized for a host of other primates
~1 for danger in the air
~1 for danger on the ground
misc for unspecified danger
I would bet that modern swearing maps to these calls in a less specific way. Equivalents of "this shite" "that arsehole" and "damnnit" may have an evolutionary origin.
That being a possible reason why certain words alleviate, they actually operate at a different level in our conciousness.
I dunno why, but wow seems to work well for me.
An adjective from the same stem would make another word with the meaning on the other side of the spectrum, which is basically "really cool, highly approved". An adjective similar but constructed in a little different way would mean "weird, crazy".
From the same stem you can make three most common verbs, one with meanings "beat up", "steal", another quite similar with meaning "lie" and a third one meaning "talk". Light modifications of the latter form allow some fine-tuning of the meaning, giving words describing more complex behaviour: 1) suddenly say something unexpected, that will attract the attention of others, causing amazement and approval, 2) unintentionally give up a secret, blurt out too much, 3) get yourself in trouble by talking too much, or even 4) fall down from a certain height or bump into an object receiving a light injury.
and so on, and so forth..
I think this is in part due to the nature of the words, they “appeal” (perhaps come from) a much older part of our minds than the idea that they might be offensive. The most effective swears are generally about procreation and other bodily functions - the things that we cared about before we even had that much of our current language.
Another side effect of this seems to be visible in those with dementia and other age or illness related degradations: some can barely say a few words normally but can still string a perfectly coherent set of expletives together when they need or want.
I wonder if different fake swear words may have had a different outcome.
"Johnny, Momma tells me you said X. That's pretty bad, but at least you didn't say the worst word..."
"What's that?" "Can't tell you!" <negotiations> "OK, but you have to PROMISE you'll never say it in front of Momma. It's <whispers> booglashek."
Next day, all his friends were over, calling each other booglasheks.
Lucy Ricardo: OK, what are they?
Percy Livermore: [with emphasis] One of them is "swell" and the other one is "lousy".
Fred Mertz: Well, give us the lousy one first.
"No, it's just 'a goat'."
"No! It's a fucking goat!"
a deer with no eyes? no idea
a deer w no eyes and no front legs? still no idea
a deer with no eyes, no front legs, and no balls? still no fucking idea